This panel critically examines the idea that intellectual property litigation is always an expense for rights holders, and raises a provocative question: can litigation, in certain scenarios, be part of a monetization strategy? With experienced litigators on both sides—lawyers representing patent holders and licensee companies—the session will explore cases in which enforcing rights has generated significant income, whether through settlements, licenses, or favorable court orders. Controversial issues will also be addressed, such as the role of litigation funding, the strategic use of litigation in negotiations, and the possible ethical and legal limits of pursuing litigation for commercial gain. A space to discuss to what extent enforcement can be viewed as an investment rather than a cost.